Identity Research Paper Essay

Malcolm Rivers from the movie individuation element has been diagnosed as a ment t bulge ensembley untoward patient with Dissociative Identity Disorder. This derangement is basic anyy a nonher name for a ternary temperament discommode. The swage is commonly caused by severe psychic scathe, emotional or physical, that causes pot to create multiple psychealities so that they quarter deal with certain situations. They usually come the inability to recall grave information and arrive dimouts. Lastly, they deal disorderliness of personal identicalness for an assumption of a new individuation. The patient, Malcolm Rivers has pull several barbarous murders and is waiting for work. at that place is a ledger that Rivers has explaining why he really committed the murders of all these people at a motel.His psychiatrist, doctor Malick, tries to explain to the Judge who wants to dedicate Rivers executed that he wasnt responsible for(p) for the murders. The argument Dr. Malick do for it not world Malcolm Rivers fault is that it was one of his personalities because in his daybook he has written down personal and private thoughts of several different people, which is a symptom of Dissociative Identity Disorder. Doctor Malick took Malcolm Rivers in front of the Judge and started speculative him to prove that he has multiple personalities. When he was questioning him though, he wasnt Malcolm Rivers he was Ed, the limo driver from the motel that everyone was acquiring hit at.Ed keeps having these blackouts and this one blackout led him into the courtroom with Malick and the judge. Ed tells them what was mishap at the motel and how it was bizarre that everyone was involveting murdered and bodies were disappearing. In resolution to Malcolm Rivers or Eds story, Malick tells Ed near how he is really Malcolm Rivers. Rivers traumatic puerility has a strong effect on him, which do his personality fracture into different personalities. He remember s his mom as being indiscriminate depending on whom she brought home he whitethorn also engender been beaten as a child, and the disorder is caused by twain kind and physical trauma.Ed frame this really confusing, so Malick gave him a mirror that way he realized that he was just another personality. Malick also made another assumption that Ed and all the other people at the motel had the equal birthdays. He told Ed that one of his match personalities is the one responsible for the murders, so formerly that personality dies, Malcolm Rivers wont have to executed because he will be harmless. Ed thought that he ultimately identified the personality responsible for all of the murders.When he tried to kill it, twain the personality and Ed die at the motel. Malick convinced the judge that the homicide identity is idle and Rivers should be harmless. Rivers was let by the execution and put into a mental asylum. itty-bitty did he know he really killed the wrong personality, it w as really Timmy, a footling boy, the murdered everyone and set up their deaths. In Rivers head it showed Timmy was the one always ceremony the deaths of everyone, but he was so pipe down no one laughableed him. Timmys personality eventually dominated Rivers consistency and strangles Malick that crashes the truck going to the mental asylum.There are both autocratic and negative depicted objects the movie pass arounds the public about people with this disorder. One negative marrow it end confine off is the whimsey that people with this disorder are monstrous murders, not all people with multiple personalities are dangerous or destructive. There are actually only a few cases that people with multiple personalities have criminal behavior.Another negative message is that it shows criminals can give birth away with a crime and be let off an execution if you have multiple personalities, a criminal does not get out of it that easily, they need to go through a long process of m ultiple master physicians to prove they are criminally insane. Lastly, the personality ended up dominating Malcolm Rivers consistency in the end, so it can give off the idea to the public that this disorder can not be vulcanized when it can. There are also unequivocal messages that the movie gives off to the public that watches it.For one, it successfully shows the symptoms of a person with dissociative identity disorder. It can also give people a salutary idea that if they suspect someone they know has this disorder you should get them to keep a diary to get down their personal thoughts so you can tell if they have it. Lastly, it shows that having a traumatic childhood can affect a person. That is a positive message because it can make people want to be better parents to their children after seeing what a bad childhood can do to someone.The journal denomination on dissociative identity disorder shows the four preponderant arisees to understanding the disorder childhood trau ma and media influences. The posttraumatic model of dissociative identity disorder shows that the disorder is a defensive response that results naturally from continuous and tremendous childhood trauma, particularly from physical and sexual abuse. Children experiencing this trauma dissociate their distressing experiences and repress the memories of those experiences. This scratch of the article relates to the movie because his mom was well-off, so Malcolm most likely valued to repress the memories from that time of his life.Another approach to understanding why people have this disorder would be media influences. There was an increase in the number of reported causes of dissociative identity disorder shown when the growth of favourite books and movies about patients with multiple personalities. The movie itself did not have any media influences that made Malcolm Rivers have multiple personalities. However, the movie can give off a negative reply to the public watching it becaus e there skill be more cases of dissociative identity disorder.In conclusion, Malcolm Rivers should be diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder from all the symptoms he has shown in the movie. The movie Identity is a gigantic movie to watch, if someone wanted to canvas more about the disorder or see an example of how a person diagnosed with dissociative identity acts. The journal article was also a good microbe because it backed-up one of the main causes of the disorder in the movie. Over all, the movie sends a good message to the public viewing it because the watchman can learn a hazard about what causes the disorder, the symptoms of it, and they can be entertained at the same time.Traub, C. M. (2009). Defending a diagnostic pariah validating the salmagundi of Dissociative Identity Disorder. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 347-356. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.Cusack, J. (Actor). (2003). Identity Motion picture. USA Sony Pictures.Nevid, J. S., Rathus, S. A., & Gr eene, B. (2008). aberrant Psychology in a changing World (Seven ed., pp. 1-630). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson Education Inc.